Blog Post

Does Australia’s R&D environment limit innovation in animal health?

Staff writers

To bring new products to market in any industry generally involvements a significant R&D investment followed by the complex navigation of industry and government regulations. Nowhere is this more true than in agriculture, and particularly the animal health sector.

The R&D process in the Australian animal health sector is a lengthy one, with pharmaceutical products taking an average of six years to progress from conception to market, and biological products (such as vaccines) even longer.

This is complicated by our strict biosecurity laws which – while commendable for preventing many foreign diseases and pests from entering the country – make it difficult for companies to import the biological products necessary to develop certain vaccines. The regulatory requirements of the sector are lengthy, and it generally takes 18 months to get an animal health product registered. As a comparison, in New Zealand the regulatory process has a legislated timeframe of just 40 days.

One company deeply invested in the animal health R&D environment in Australia is French multinational Virbac, the seventh-largest animal health company in the world. Virbac has a significant presence in Australia, with 250 staff including a specialist Australian R&D team developing products solely for the Australian animal health market.

Robert Dempster, Research Development and Licensing Director at Virbac, believes that one of the key factors limiting innovation in animal health (and in agriculture in general) in Australia is the disconnect between researchers and industry.

“Researchers have a very blinkered approach to the opportunities for commercialisation of their inventions,” says Dempster. “It’s not that we on the commercial side try to pour cold water on innovation, but I think in many cases the innovation is not well-directed as to who is going to pay for the product and how it is going to be used.

“Industry and academia need to work closer together to fund real-world problems and create products that have commercial potential.”

The gulf between the interests of researchers and the commercial needs of companies is one that is difficult to bridge. One solution is to encourage an atmosphere where companies and research institutions such as universities partner together earlier to fund innovation that has a clear commercial goal.

This could be achieved by incentivising academics and applying commercial outcomes to the research rankings that drive the direction and undertaking of innovation at universities. If signing a deal with a commercial company gave an academic as many points towards their research ranking as publication in a popular academic journal, then perhaps more research would result in commercialisation.

“Industry and academia partnering early is super important because although Australia does discovery really well, we do commercialisation poorly,” says Dempster. “Agricultural innovation is no different to any other type of industry in Australia – private industry doesn’t invest enough in R&D, we aren’t close enough to academia and academia isn’t close enough to us.”

It is this distance between researchers and companies that is stifling innovation in Australian industry, and particularly in the animal health sector. It is something that needs to be tackled by government policy makers, research institutions and industry bodies in order to ensure Australian R&D remains competitive and Australian products can be commercially successful on both a global and a domestic scale.

NEWS
16 Feb, 2024
HARDI Australia has long been at the forefront of technological development for Australian farmers, giving way to a game-changing solution to the perennial agricultural problem of weed control.
By Jessica Martyn 16 Feb, 2024
When it comes to building and maintaining a successful farming business in Australia, implementing the right solutions to deliver and preserve essential resources like fresh water is crucial – and in these ponds, White International is an authority more than 70 years strong.
16 Feb, 2024
After five decades of consistently setting new standards in forage harvesting technology, including perfect cut quality, ideal chop length, and efficient kernel processing, CLAAS has recently released a special edition JAGUAR 990 TERRA TRAC model at Agritechnica.
By By Jennifer McKee 16 Feb, 2024
In today's fast-paced world, embracing technology has become essential for industries to thrive, and the Australian agriculture industry is no exception.
04 Dec, 2023
As a Landcare group, one of our main interests is to increase ecological resilience in our local area. Many of our landscapes have been cleared of vegetation in previous decades, so we have the task of supporting landholders to plant trees and shrubs to replace those that are missing. The benefits of revegetation are manifold. They include providing habitat for a range of native animals; controlling erosion and salinity; increasing farm productivity through nutrient cycling and shade and shelter for stock; and drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. But as weather patterns become more variable and we experience more climatic extremes, we need to think about which plant species – and which plant genetics – are most appropriate in our revegetation efforts. We are forced to ask will our local plantings be able to survive our future climate? Up until recently, it has been common for people to preference locally sourced seed when re-planting. This has been based on the idea that such plants will be best adapted to local conditions. However, there is growing understanding among scientists and land managers that we need to shift our focus to plants that can persist as the climate changes. This involves looking at which plant species are most appropriate by focussing on species that have a wide distribution and grow in our area and also in hotter areas, and increasing the genetic diversity of our tubestock so they have the best potential to adapt over successive generations. Our Landcare group has been tackling this issue for the past several years, working with scientists and AdaptNSW to find the best way forward. There are several key steps involved: understanding our local future climate, analysing whether selected local species can survive in climates like the one projected for our area, and sourcing seed for those likely-to-survive species from a range of areas to increase the genetic diversity of our plantings. Planting the right species with good genetic diversity gives revegetation projects the best chance of survival into the future. It’s not just about making sure the individual tubestock will grow, but that future generations of those plants will be able to survive and thrive. Luckily there are some good resources available for farmers, land managers and groups interested in climate ready revegetation. The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney has launched the Restore and Renew Webtool ( https://www.restore-and-renew.org.au/ ), which is a wonderful way for people to incorporate both climate change and genetic information when sourcing seed or plants. The NSW Niche Finder is invaluable for those who want to dig further into climate variables and species distribution ( http://www.nswnichefinder.net/ ). For future climate information, the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology have joined forces to provide a user-friendly online tool ( https://myclimateview.com.au/ ). And AdaptNSW also provides projected climate change information for different regions of the state ( https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/projections-map ). The Yass Area Network of Landcare Groups also has detailed information about our work on climate ready revegetation and relevant resources our website: https://yan.org.au/projects/climate-ready-revegetation-project As the climate changes, our revegetation efforts are more important than ever. And we need to make sure that they are ‘climate ready’ so that their benefits persist well into the future.
04 Dec, 2023
Some weeks, Amy Pascoe spends more time with mushrooms than humans. In this Q&A the Little Acre co-founder talks stereotypes, innovation, and the problem with “Grown in Australia” labels.
Show More
Share by: