Blog Post

Quad bike manufacturers to withdraw from Australian market if proposed standard becomes law

Vivien Lin

Honda and Yamaha have announced they will remove their quad bikes from the Australian market if Parliament adopts the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s (ACCC) recommendations to improve safety.

Quad bikes are currently the largest cause of death and injury on Australian farms. Since 2011, 130 people have been killed in quad bike accidents, with around 15 per cent of deaths involving children.

As part of its investigation into quad bike safety , the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recommended the establishment of a mandatory safety standard. The draft safety standard , which would apply to all quad bikes supplied in Australia, proposes four elements including meeting overseas standards, additional consumer information, stability benchmarks and fitting an operator (rollover) protection device (OPD).

However, Honda Australia believes the standard is “flawed, unworkable and may put farmers’ lives at greater risk” and will stop selling ATVs in Australia if it becomes law.

“No reputable company can meet the proposal because it lacks engineering and design rigour,” says Honda Australia Motorcycle & Power Equipment’s Managing Director Mr Robert Toscano. “Any company that tries to meet the standard will be open to the accusation that it is playing with farmers’ lives.”

Similarly, Yamaha engineers will not make the proposed design changes and cease selling utility ATVs in Australia should the standard be implemented.

“The science behind the draft is both faulty and selective,” says Yamaha Motor Australia Director Brad Ryan.

Nevertheless, National Farmers’ Federation Workforce Committee Chair Charlie Armstrong has welcomed the announcements by Honda and Yamaha.

“Assuming both Honda and Yamaha follow-through on their withdrawal, Australian farmers will be safer without the danger that their products currently pose,” says Mr. Armstrong.

Mr Armstrong says that Honda and Yamaha relied on misinformation in deciding to withdraw their quad bikes, including commissioned American computer modelling. The NFF also considers that these manufacturers have dismissed the consensus of various professional bodies including independent studies by Australian academics, the opinions of peak health professionals and industry bodies and the recommendations of the ACCC, which are based on over 18 months of consultation and analysis.

While Honda and Yamaha’s withdrawal would leave a hole in the Australian quad bike market, this is not necessarily a bad thing, according to Mr Armstrong.

“The void will be filled by other vehicles and manufacturers who embrace safety and are as horrified as the NFF at the frequent reports of death, and serious injury relating to quad bike use,” says Armstrong. “If this move saves just one life then it will be worth it.”

Submissions on the exposure draft mandatory safety standard recommended by the ACCC will close on 10 June. You can submit your comments or simply find out more here.

For more information on quad bike and general farm safety, check out the ACCC’s Quad Bike Safety Issues Paper here.



NEWS
16 Feb, 2024
HARDI Australia has long been at the forefront of technological development for Australian farmers, giving way to a game-changing solution to the perennial agricultural problem of weed control.
By Jessica Martyn 16 Feb, 2024
When it comes to building and maintaining a successful farming business in Australia, implementing the right solutions to deliver and preserve essential resources like fresh water is crucial – and in these ponds, White International is an authority more than 70 years strong.
16 Feb, 2024
After five decades of consistently setting new standards in forage harvesting technology, including perfect cut quality, ideal chop length, and efficient kernel processing, CLAAS has recently released a special edition JAGUAR 990 TERRA TRAC model at Agritechnica.
By By Jennifer McKee 16 Feb, 2024
In today's fast-paced world, embracing technology has become essential for industries to thrive, and the Australian agriculture industry is no exception.
04 Dec, 2023
As a Landcare group, one of our main interests is to increase ecological resilience in our local area. Many of our landscapes have been cleared of vegetation in previous decades, so we have the task of supporting landholders to plant trees and shrubs to replace those that are missing. The benefits of revegetation are manifold. They include providing habitat for a range of native animals; controlling erosion and salinity; increasing farm productivity through nutrient cycling and shade and shelter for stock; and drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. But as weather patterns become more variable and we experience more climatic extremes, we need to think about which plant species – and which plant genetics – are most appropriate in our revegetation efforts. We are forced to ask will our local plantings be able to survive our future climate? Up until recently, it has been common for people to preference locally sourced seed when re-planting. This has been based on the idea that such plants will be best adapted to local conditions. However, there is growing understanding among scientists and land managers that we need to shift our focus to plants that can persist as the climate changes. This involves looking at which plant species are most appropriate by focussing on species that have a wide distribution and grow in our area and also in hotter areas, and increasing the genetic diversity of our tubestock so they have the best potential to adapt over successive generations. Our Landcare group has been tackling this issue for the past several years, working with scientists and AdaptNSW to find the best way forward. There are several key steps involved: understanding our local future climate, analysing whether selected local species can survive in climates like the one projected for our area, and sourcing seed for those likely-to-survive species from a range of areas to increase the genetic diversity of our plantings. Planting the right species with good genetic diversity gives revegetation projects the best chance of survival into the future. It’s not just about making sure the individual tubestock will grow, but that future generations of those plants will be able to survive and thrive. Luckily there are some good resources available for farmers, land managers and groups interested in climate ready revegetation. The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney has launched the Restore and Renew Webtool ( https://www.restore-and-renew.org.au/ ), which is a wonderful way for people to incorporate both climate change and genetic information when sourcing seed or plants. The NSW Niche Finder is invaluable for those who want to dig further into climate variables and species distribution ( http://www.nswnichefinder.net/ ). For future climate information, the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology have joined forces to provide a user-friendly online tool ( https://myclimateview.com.au/ ). And AdaptNSW also provides projected climate change information for different regions of the state ( https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/projections-map ). The Yass Area Network of Landcare Groups also has detailed information about our work on climate ready revegetation and relevant resources our website: https://yan.org.au/projects/climate-ready-revegetation-project As the climate changes, our revegetation efforts are more important than ever. And we need to make sure that they are ‘climate ready’ so that their benefits persist well into the future.
04 Dec, 2023
Some weeks, Amy Pascoe spends more time with mushrooms than humans. In this Q&A the Little Acre co-founder talks stereotypes, innovation, and the problem with “Grown in Australia” labels.
Show More
Share by: