Red meat paper leaves levy issue unsolved

Chanelle Mansour

Recommendations made in the White Paper review into the industry Memorandum of Understanding have received mixed reception among affected groups, with levies a sticking point for Cattle Producers Australia and Property Rights Australia.

The White Paper, put forward by the Red Meat Advisory Council , has recommended Australia's red meat industry representative groups to be merged and unified as one body, to be known as Red Meat Australia, with one representative from each making up the board.

It also recommends that the research functions of the Australian Meat Processors Council , LiveCorp and Meat & Livestock Australia be combined into a single body, and that the MoU be renewed and updated.

Cattle Producers Australia (CPA) issued a statement saying the white paper restructure proposal was “damaging for Australia’s red meat industries”, because it left grass-fed cattle levy payers who contributed the lion’s share of industry levy funding largely unrepresented.

CPA chair Dr Paul Wright said it appeared the recommendations from a string of Senate inquiries, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and other reviews appeared had been ignored by the review panel. Leav

“This is leaving levy payers even further removed from any opportunity to influence how their levies are spent and how policies which affect their industry are developed.

“The proposal is the antithesis of no taxation without representation,” Dr Wright said.

Property Rights Australia (PRA) shared their take on the issue, saying it was beyond hypocritical for a process that started with the grass-fed cattle industry request democratic reform, which involved two Senate inquiries, to result in the most undemocratic structure that could possibly be conceived.

PRA Chair Joanne Rea says that through the extensive consultation provided through repeated Senate inquiries producers were adamant that they wanted more control of their levies and democratic industry organisations.

“A very large proportion of the family production sector thought that the recommendations were very good and indicative of what our industry needed,” she said. “Producers, particularly family farmers. have been ignored in this flawed process.”

However, other public statements put forward on the Red Meat MoU review have given their support to the white paper's recommendations.

Sheep Producers Australia (SPA) has welcomed recommendations, with SPA Chair Chris Mirams saying the white paper outlined a bold and visionary option for the industry’s future, which was exactly what SPA had called for in response to the initial consultation phase.

“The white paper highlights the need to create a new fit-for-purpose structure to provide effective national industry leadership. This is a once in 20-year opportunity,” Mr Mirams says.

Peak Industry Council representing red meat processors, wholesalers and retailers, the Australian Meat Industry Council (AMIC), released a statement following the white paper release saying it will engage with members in coming weeks to discuss its recommendations.

“We’ll be going out to members in the coming weeks and months to gauge their response to the white paper and in due course will share our thoughts on the best way forward to ensure greater returns for our members,” AMIC CEO Patrick Hutchinson says.

To review the Red Meat Advisory Council’s White Paper proposal, click here.

NEWS
December 18, 2025
Prodoz, a Proudly Australian and family-owned agribusiness, based in Melbourne, is strengthening its positions as national/international leader in advanced crop – science solutions through a growing portfolio of global innovation partners and a distribution footprint supported by all major distributors - includes Nutrien Ag, Elders, Lindsay Rural and Independent Rural stores.
December 18, 2025
Australia’s climate is tougher than ever. Heat spikes, dry periods, salinity, waterlogging and sudden frost events are becoming an everyday part of farmers lives.
December 17, 2025
Trace minerals are required for optimal growth, reproduction, and immunity. Optimising trace mineral status relying solely on oral supplements across a herd may fail because of variation in individual intake and reduced absorption due to antagonism of other ration components and minerals. The use of injectable trace mineral supplements has been associated with positive reproductive outcomes including improved conception rate, increased odds of pregnancy and greater final in calf rate. A study conducted on 2,168 dairy cows, administered injectable trace minerals, four weeks prior to calving and again four weeks prior to the start of mating showed treated animals had a 3.3 per cent greater final in-calf rate, and a reduced time from start of mating to conception, compared to control animals 1 . The Importance of B12 Dr Carl Eden, Technical Services Veterinarian with Boehringer Ingelheim says “Vitamin B12 is sometimes referred to as a ‘super vitamin’ because it is only required in very small amounts but vital to many essential metabolic pathways. However, demand for B12 can vary considerably during the year and we see serum levels of B12 fall at critical times, such as the first few months after calving.” Vitamin B12 contains cobalt, so deficiency in cobalt can lead to deficiency in vitamin B12 because ruminants get most of their B12 as a byproduct of ruminal fermentation where the bacteria in their rumen assemble B12 from cobalt for use by the cow. Sub-optimal trace mineral and vitamin B12 status at calving, mating, and drying off has been shown to negatively impact growth, reproduction, and immunity. Using a trace mineral injectable containing vitamin B12 can improve trace mineral and vitamin B12 status at these critical times. Marks-Min with Vitamin B12 – The Evidence In the largest trace element study to date, Marks-Min Injectable Trace Mineral with Vitamin B12 demonstrated remarkable results when compared to a reference trace mineral injection. “Given the differences between Marks-Min and other products on the market, we wanted to generate a compelling data set to demonstrate how effective it was compared to the pioneer product. We entrusted this work to a third-party research company” says Dr Eden. “We chose farms that were at the top of their game from a reproductive perspective. We made sure that the farms had no evidence of trace element or vitamin B12 deficiencies or excess.” Across all outcomes of interest, Marks-Min demonstrated clear non-inferiority when compared to the reference product. Outcomes measured included submission, pregnancy and conception rates, and six week in-calf rate. Marks-Min demonstrated it is highly suited as an alternative treatment to the reference product. Reference: 1. Hawkins, D., and B. V. S. Franklin. New Zealand Dairy Veterinarians Newsletter 24 (2007): 12-16 Company website: livestockfirst.com.au Company email address: CustomerCare.Australia@boehringer-ingelheim.com Company video: https://vimeo.com/1138807630?fl=pl&fe=cm
December 17, 2025
Find out why the first summer drench can be so important in protecting your flock’s health, plus what to look for in your summer drench of choice.
December 17, 2025
A NSW-based innovator has developed a patent-pending, front-mounted firefighting and utility system for tractors, giving farmers instant, in-cab-controlled fire suppression, water and fuel on hand, and safer solo operations.
December 12, 2025
Barko Security is bringing drone technology to agriculture while building on a decade of security and a lifetime of agricultural know-how.
Show More