Blog Post

Red meat paper leaves levy issue unsolved

Chanelle Mansour

Recommendations made in the White Paper review into the industry Memorandum of Understanding have received mixed reception among affected groups, with levies a sticking point for Cattle Producers Australia and Property Rights Australia.

The White Paper, put forward by the Red Meat Advisory Council , has recommended Australia's red meat industry representative groups to be merged and unified as one body, to be known as Red Meat Australia, with one representative from each making up the board.

It also recommends that the research functions of the Australian Meat Processors Council , LiveCorp and Meat & Livestock Australia be combined into a single body, and that the MoU be renewed and updated.

Cattle Producers Australia (CPA) issued a statement saying the white paper restructure proposal was “damaging for Australia’s red meat industries”, because it left grass-fed cattle levy payers who contributed the lion’s share of industry levy funding largely unrepresented.

CPA chair Dr Paul Wright said it appeared the recommendations from a string of Senate inquiries, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and other reviews appeared had been ignored by the review panel. Leav

“This is leaving levy payers even further removed from any opportunity to influence how their levies are spent and how policies which affect their industry are developed.

“The proposal is the antithesis of no taxation without representation,” Dr Wright said.

Property Rights Australia (PRA) shared their take on the issue, saying it was beyond hypocritical for a process that started with the grass-fed cattle industry request democratic reform, which involved two Senate inquiries, to result in the most undemocratic structure that could possibly be conceived.

PRA Chair Joanne Rea says that through the extensive consultation provided through repeated Senate inquiries producers were adamant that they wanted more control of their levies and democratic industry organisations.

“A very large proportion of the family production sector thought that the recommendations were very good and indicative of what our industry needed,” she said. “Producers, particularly family farmers. have been ignored in this flawed process.”

However, other public statements put forward on the Red Meat MoU review have given their support to the white paper's recommendations.

Sheep Producers Australia (SPA) has welcomed recommendations, with SPA Chair Chris Mirams saying the white paper outlined a bold and visionary option for the industry’s future, which was exactly what SPA had called for in response to the initial consultation phase.

“The white paper highlights the need to create a new fit-for-purpose structure to provide effective national industry leadership. This is a once in 20-year opportunity,” Mr Mirams says.

Peak Industry Council representing red meat processors, wholesalers and retailers, the Australian Meat Industry Council (AMIC), released a statement following the white paper release saying it will engage with members in coming weeks to discuss its recommendations.

“We’ll be going out to members in the coming weeks and months to gauge their response to the white paper and in due course will share our thoughts on the best way forward to ensure greater returns for our members,” AMIC CEO Patrick Hutchinson says.

To review the Red Meat Advisory Council’s White Paper proposal, click here.

NEWS
16 Feb, 2024
HARDI Australia has long been at the forefront of technological development for Australian farmers, giving way to a game-changing solution to the perennial agricultural problem of weed control.
By Jessica Martyn 16 Feb, 2024
When it comes to building and maintaining a successful farming business in Australia, implementing the right solutions to deliver and preserve essential resources like fresh water is crucial – and in these ponds, White International is an authority more than 70 years strong.
16 Feb, 2024
After five decades of consistently setting new standards in forage harvesting technology, including perfect cut quality, ideal chop length, and efficient kernel processing, CLAAS has recently released a special edition JAGUAR 990 TERRA TRAC model at Agritechnica.
By By Jennifer McKee 16 Feb, 2024
In today's fast-paced world, embracing technology has become essential for industries to thrive, and the Australian agriculture industry is no exception.
04 Dec, 2023
As a Landcare group, one of our main interests is to increase ecological resilience in our local area. Many of our landscapes have been cleared of vegetation in previous decades, so we have the task of supporting landholders to plant trees and shrubs to replace those that are missing. The benefits of revegetation are manifold. They include providing habitat for a range of native animals; controlling erosion and salinity; increasing farm productivity through nutrient cycling and shade and shelter for stock; and drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. But as weather patterns become more variable and we experience more climatic extremes, we need to think about which plant species – and which plant genetics – are most appropriate in our revegetation efforts. We are forced to ask will our local plantings be able to survive our future climate? Up until recently, it has been common for people to preference locally sourced seed when re-planting. This has been based on the idea that such plants will be best adapted to local conditions. However, there is growing understanding among scientists and land managers that we need to shift our focus to plants that can persist as the climate changes. This involves looking at which plant species are most appropriate by focussing on species that have a wide distribution and grow in our area and also in hotter areas, and increasing the genetic diversity of our tubestock so they have the best potential to adapt over successive generations. Our Landcare group has been tackling this issue for the past several years, working with scientists and AdaptNSW to find the best way forward. There are several key steps involved: understanding our local future climate, analysing whether selected local species can survive in climates like the one projected for our area, and sourcing seed for those likely-to-survive species from a range of areas to increase the genetic diversity of our plantings. Planting the right species with good genetic diversity gives revegetation projects the best chance of survival into the future. It’s not just about making sure the individual tubestock will grow, but that future generations of those plants will be able to survive and thrive. Luckily there are some good resources available for farmers, land managers and groups interested in climate ready revegetation. The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney has launched the Restore and Renew Webtool ( https://www.restore-and-renew.org.au/ ), which is a wonderful way for people to incorporate both climate change and genetic information when sourcing seed or plants. The NSW Niche Finder is invaluable for those who want to dig further into climate variables and species distribution ( http://www.nswnichefinder.net/ ). For future climate information, the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology have joined forces to provide a user-friendly online tool ( https://myclimateview.com.au/ ). And AdaptNSW also provides projected climate change information for different regions of the state ( https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/projections-map ). The Yass Area Network of Landcare Groups also has detailed information about our work on climate ready revegetation and relevant resources our website: https://yan.org.au/projects/climate-ready-revegetation-project As the climate changes, our revegetation efforts are more important than ever. And we need to make sure that they are ‘climate ready’ so that their benefits persist well into the future.
04 Dec, 2023
Some weeks, Amy Pascoe spends more time with mushrooms than humans. In this Q&A the Little Acre co-founder talks stereotypes, innovation, and the problem with “Grown in Australia” labels.
Show More
Share by: