1MG FlippingBooks
Report reveals inequality in health outcomes between remote and metropolitan areas
Vivien Lin
A new report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare(AIHW) reveals that although the overall health of the Australian population has improved substantially, those in remote and very remote communities are still disadvantaged when it comes to health outcomes.
The Australian Burden of Disease Study: Impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015 analyses the impact of over 200 diseases and injuries in relation to living with illness and premature death.
It shows that the Australian population has become healthier overall, experiencing an 11 percent reduction in total burden between 2003 and 2015. Further gains in health can be achieved by limiting exposure to lifestyle-related risk factors including tobacco use, obesity and dietary risk.
Nevertheless, disease burden is not shared equally across Australia with large inequalities across remoteness areas. Remote and very remote areas are significantly disadvantaged and experience burden 1.4 times higher than major cities. This is driven by noticeably higher burden rates for kidney and urinary diseases, injuries, infectious diseases, endocrine disorders and cardiovascular diseases.
In addition to this, the three leading causes of fatal burden – cancer, cardiovascular diseases and injuries – are respectively 1.2, 1.8 and 2.6 times higher in remote and very remote areas in comparison to major cities.
Health adjusted life expectancy is also 5.2 and 5.8 years shorter for males and females respectively than for those in major cities.
The difference in the disease burden rate is most pronounced in the Northern Territory where the burden rate is around 1.4 times higher than the national average.
The AIHW report identifies a number of factors that may explain this disparity, noting that those in more remote areas are often disadvantaged when it comes to educational and employment opportunities, income, and access to goods and services.
Health behaviours in remote areas also differ from that in major cities. For example, the proportion of people who go to hospital for conditions that are considered potentially preventable with timely and adequate non-hospital care is higher outside major cities.
Furthermore, providing health services in more remote areas is often more costly due to the limited availability of infrastructure and the workforce required to provide these services.
Research by the National Rural Health Alliance has found that there are 80 percent less specialists in remote Australia compared to major cities.
You can learn more about rural and remote health here.
NEWS
High-precision GNSS has typically been too costly and complex for all but the most critical agricultural operations, but recent RTK GNSS innovations have made centimetre accuracy scalable to all applications in Ag-Tech.
Every Aussie farmer knows that the difference between a “good” crop and a “record-breaking” one often come down to the smallest details. At BioFlora, we’ve spent years perfecting the balance of plant nutrition, and the result is IsoGreen – our powerhouse liquid formula designed to push your yields and crop taste to their absolute peak.
Plant, spray and harvest with confidence using reliable centimetre level positioning. Hexagon SmartNet provides fast, accurate RTK corrections across Australia to reduce overlaps, lower input costs and maximise productivity. With no base station required, simply connect, get a fix and get to work.
Built for the demand of Aussie farmers. Designed for every day performance.
They’re wriggly black grubs more commonly tossed to backyard hens than served at the dinner table, but black soldier fly larvae could soon play a key role in building a more sustainable food system, according to new research from Adelaide University.
After four years of customer research and 500,000 test kilometres, Ford says the Ranger Super Duty brings farmer-driven customisation into the factory, with more towing, payload, and durability built in.
