1MG FlippingBooks
Report reveals inequality in health outcomes between remote and metropolitan areas
Vivien Lin
A new report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reveals that although the overall health of the Australian population has improved substantially, those in remote and very remote communities are still disadvantaged when it comes to health outcomes.
The Australian Burden of Disease Study: Impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2015 analyses the impact of over 200 diseases and injuries in relation to living with illness and premature death.
It shows that the Australian population has become healthier overall, experiencing an 11 percent reduction in total burden between 2003 and 2015. Further gains in health can be achieved by limiting exposure to lifestyle-related risk factors including tobacco use, obesity and dietary risk.
Nevertheless, disease burden is not shared equally across Australia with large inequalities across remoteness areas. Remote and very remote areas are significantly disadvantaged and experience burden 1.4 times higher than major cities. This is driven by noticeably higher burden rates for kidney and urinary diseases, injuries, infectious diseases, endocrine disorders and cardiovascular diseases.
In addition to this, the three leading causes of fatal burden – cancer, cardiovascular diseases and injuries – are respectively 1.2, 1.8 and 2.6 times higher in remote and very remote areas in comparison to major cities.
Health adjusted life expectancy is also 5.2 and 5.8 years shorter for males and females respectively than for those in major cities.
The difference in the disease burden rate is most pronounced in the Northern Territory where the burden rate is around 1.4 times higher than the national average.
The AIHW report identifies a number of factors that may explain this disparity, noting that those in more remote areas are often disadvantaged when it comes to educational and employment opportunities, income, and access to goods and services.
Health behaviours in remote areas also differ from that in major cities. For example, the proportion of people who go to hospital for conditions that are considered potentially preventable with timely and adequate non-hospital care is higher outside major cities.
Furthermore, providing health services in more remote areas is often more costly due to the limited availability of infrastructure and the workforce required to provide these services.
Research by the National Rural Health Alliance has found that there are 80 percent less specialists in remote Australia compared to major cities.
You can learn more about rural and remote health here.
NEWS
Nature is still too complex for artificial intelligence (AI) modelling to be effective, but the tipping point is close, according to a new study that found the technology may still trip at the last real-world hurdle.
Feedlot cattle with access to grooming brushes are generally more content, sociable and have less stress, according to recent research out of Murdoch University’s Centre for Animal Production and Health.
Computer modelling and simulation of crops can guide decision making by predicting consequences of crop management and genetic trait improvement options.
With business Greenhouse Gas emissions reporting now a reality in Australia, and agriculture becoming increasingly entangled in the carbon economy, how can farmers best position themselves?
Innovation, technological solutions and teamwork – those were the themes that comprised the first GrowHer ag-tech event in Rockhampton this week. 
New Zealand farmers are well-accustomed to turning sunlight into food and fibre. Now, as Mike Casey writes, there’s an opportunity to turn that sunlight into something else that will benefit New Zealand and the rural sector: renewable electricity.
