Bringing autonomous agricultural machines to the field: What is required?

Associate Professor Jayantha Katupitiya

In the world of autonomy, we always refer to the last mile. This article proposes ways to confront the challenges of the last mile.

There is ample evidence from around the world demonstrating that autonomous agricultural vehicles are gradually making their way into farming operations. Although widespread deployment has yet to occur globally and major commercial players have not fully entered the large-scale autonomous equipment market, startups and small machinery developers have been actively conducting field trials of their inventions and innovations.


It is also well known that the development of autonomous vehicle technology has progressed beyond the research stage and is now focused on creating practical, field-ready units for agricultural use. At the same time, there is clear evidence that established commercial enterprises are acquiring technologies developed by startups. This underscores the crucial role that startups play in advancing autonomous agricultural machinery.


As researchers and developers of autonomous agricultural machines at the University of New South Wales and Thornfield Robotics Pty. Ltd., we have identified and understood the needs and aspirations of the farming community—the end users of these technologies.


Opposing Factors

First, many farmers perceive autonomous machines as prohibitively expensive to purchase and maintain. Second, they often view the process of deploying these machines as complex, time-consuming, and demanding entirely new skills. Third, there remains a lingering doubt among many in the farming community about whether a truly hands-free operation is realistically achievable, although the modern autonomous machines are capable of carrying out the core task better than human operated machines.


However, these perceptions stand in stark contrast to the very principles on which agricultural autonomy is promoted. Autonomy is championed as a path to reducing operational costs, yet high upfront capital costs obscure the long-term financial benefits that come through improved efficiency, reduced labour expenses, and higher precision. Similarly, autonomous agricultural vehicles are positioned as a solution to the skilled labour shortage. However, the use of autonomous technology does require new skills, although these skills can be learned—and once mastered, they enable farmers to manage operations more efficiently, with less dependence on manual labour.


Challenges

Bringing harmony between these opposing forces requires overcoming a number of significant challenges. The capital investment needed to deploy autonomous machines is expected to remain high for the foreseeable future. Generally, the overhead costs of startups are substantially lower than those of major manufacturers, allowing them to offer more affordable machines in the short term. Nevertheless, farmers must identify practical ways to offset these upfront costs to make adoption economically viable.


To justify investment, autonomous machines must deliver clear productivity advantages over conventional, human-operated equipment. This includes not only easier and more efficient deployment but also a substantial reduction in labour requirements. However, achieving this vision demands considerable development work. If these systems continue to require highly skilled and specialized personnel to operate and maintain them, their appeal will diminish rapidly as personnel costs escalate.


Finally, the absence of a human operator’s supervisory role presents a critical gap that must be addressed. Effective solutions will require the development and integration of advanced condition monitoring systems, real-time fault and breakdown detection, and intelligent oversight of critical machine components. Only by filling this supervisory void can autonomous machines operate with the same reliability and adaptability currently provided by human operators.

 

Solutions

As highlighted earlier, most machinery developers have already achieved a high degree of success in executing the core task of an automated agricultural operation. For instance, consider a spot-spraying machine designed to control weeds. To be truly autonomous, the machine must not only perform the spraying itself but also leave its shed, navigate farm roads to the target field, initiate and complete the spraying operation, and return to its parked position—all without human intervention.


When this entire operational sequence is examined, several practical challenges emerge. Many machines can now successfully navigate from the shed to the field, avoid obstacles such as animals and vehicles, and return once the task is complete. Yet, they are not designed to handle seemingly simple but critical interactions—such as opening gates or traversing trenches dug for new irrigation lines. These gaps highlight an important insight: autonomy is not achieved by the machine alone, but through a symbiosis between technology and the environment. By reshaping the physical farm environment—removing clutter, standardizing layouts, and introducing structured pathways—farmers can dramatically increase the reliability, efficiency, and uptime of autonomous systems.


Every autonomous agricultural machine is built on three essential pillars: software, electrical/electronic systems, and mechanical hardware. In conventional machinery, a human operator acts as the intelligent interface—monitoring performance, detecting faults, and responding in real time. Autonomous machines, however, must embed this intelligence through advanced sensing and monitoring systems capable of detecting, for example, changes in tire pressure, system malfunctions, or structural failures. This shift from operator-dependent reliability to system-embedded intelligence represents a profound transformation in agricultural practice.


To unlock the full promise of autonomy, the launch process itself must be reimagined. Autonomous operations should not require extensive preparation or specialized skill. Instead, next-generation software must offer farm-specific, adaptive solutions that make initiating complex operations as simple as pressing a button. This ease of use will be critical to building confidence and driving adoption among farmers.


Beyond their core functions, autonomous machines provide an unparalleled platform for creating additional value. Their integrated sensors and actuators can host specialized payloads to perform multiple tasks simultaneously—including those outside traditional agriculture—thereby amplifying their eco nomic impact. For example, in agri-voltaic systems where farmland is shared with solar infrastructure, an autonomous platform can mow vegetation while monitoring solar panel performance. Similarly, by coupling AI technologies with data streams from advanced sensors, these systems can support yield forecasting, harvest date prediction, and continuous data collection—fueling a new era of data-driven, intelligent agriculture.



Ultimately, these added capabilities redefine the value proposition of autonomous machinery. They are not simply tools for automating single tasks; they are strategic platforms for transformation—integrating operations, intelligence, and adaptability. When viewed through this lens, their initial cost is not an obstacle but an investment in a smarter, more resilient, and more sustainable agricultural future.


Associate Professor Jayantha Katupitiya is from the School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at the University of NSW.

NEWS
December 18, 2025
Prodoz, a Proudly Australian and family-owned agribusiness, based in Melbourne, is strengthening its positions as national/international leader in advanced crop – science solutions through a growing portfolio of global innovation partners and a distribution footprint supported by all major distributors - includes Nutrien Ag, Elders, Lindsay Rural and Independent Rural stores.
December 18, 2025
Australia’s climate is tougher than ever. Heat spikes, dry periods, salinity, waterlogging and sudden frost events are becoming an everyday part of farmers lives.
December 17, 2025
Trace minerals are required for optimal growth, reproduction, and immunity. Optimising trace mineral status relying solely on oral supplements across a herd may fail because of variation in individual intake and reduced absorption due to antagonism of other ration components and minerals. The use of injectable trace mineral supplements has been associated with positive reproductive outcomes including improved conception rate, increased odds of pregnancy and greater final in calf rate. A study conducted on 2,168 dairy cows, administered injectable trace minerals, four weeks prior to calving and again four weeks prior to the start of mating showed treated animals had a 3.3 per cent greater final in-calf rate, and a reduced time from start of mating to conception, compared to control animals 1 . The Importance of B12 Dr Carl Eden, Technical Services Veterinarian with Boehringer Ingelheim says “Vitamin B12 is sometimes referred to as a ‘super vitamin’ because it is only required in very small amounts but vital to many essential metabolic pathways. However, demand for B12 can vary considerably during the year and we see serum levels of B12 fall at critical times, such as the first few months after calving.” Vitamin B12 contains cobalt, so deficiency in cobalt can lead to deficiency in vitamin B12 because ruminants get most of their B12 as a byproduct of ruminal fermentation where the bacteria in their rumen assemble B12 from cobalt for use by the cow. Sub-optimal trace mineral and vitamin B12 status at calving, mating, and drying off has been shown to negatively impact growth, reproduction, and immunity. Using a trace mineral injectable containing vitamin B12 can improve trace mineral and vitamin B12 status at these critical times. Marks-Min with Vitamin B12 – The Evidence In the largest trace element study to date, Marks-Min Injectable Trace Mineral with Vitamin B12 demonstrated remarkable results when compared to a reference trace mineral injection. “Given the differences between Marks-Min and other products on the market, we wanted to generate a compelling data set to demonstrate how effective it was compared to the pioneer product. We entrusted this work to a third-party research company” says Dr Eden. “We chose farms that were at the top of their game from a reproductive perspective. We made sure that the farms had no evidence of trace element or vitamin B12 deficiencies or excess.” Across all outcomes of interest, Marks-Min demonstrated clear non-inferiority when compared to the reference product. Outcomes measured included submission, pregnancy and conception rates, and six week in-calf rate. Marks-Min demonstrated it is highly suited as an alternative treatment to the reference product. Reference: 1. Hawkins, D., and B. V. S. Franklin. New Zealand Dairy Veterinarians Newsletter 24 (2007): 12-16 Company website: livestockfirst.com.au Company email address: CustomerCare.Australia@boehringer-ingelheim.com Company video: https://vimeo.com/1138807630?fl=pl&fe=cm
December 17, 2025
Find out why the first summer drench can be so important in protecting your flock’s health, plus what to look for in your summer drench of choice.
December 17, 2025
A NSW-based innovator has developed a patent-pending, front-mounted firefighting and utility system for tractors, giving farmers instant, in-cab-controlled fire suppression, water and fuel on hand, and safer solo operations.
December 12, 2025
Barko Security is bringing drone technology to agriculture while building on a decade of security and a lifetime of agricultural know-how.
Show More