Blog Post

Review to determine cause of fish kill crisis

Website Editor

The Minister for Agriculture and Water Resources David Littleproud yesterday announced news of an independent assessment into the fish death crisis that has hit Western NSW in the last couple of months.

The panel aims to identify the cause of the fish deaths and make recommendations to avoid future deaths within the parameters of the historic Murray-Darling Basin Plan and Murray-Darling Basin Agreement.

This crisis, which has seen the deaths of up to a million fish along the Darling River in Menindee, has been met with uproar from locals and government officials alike, with ongoing disputes about the cause of the deaths.

Despite considerable conjecture in the media, the federal Department of Environment and Energy has denied that the deaths are related to water mismanagement. As reported by the ABC , the department claims the crippling drought conditions in the area – which sparked an outbreak of toxic blue-green algae that suffocates fish – is to blame.

The NSW government has also come under criticism from some quarters for its role in the disaster, though NSW Minister for Primary Industries Niall Blair said the only solution to the crisis is rain.

“We really need significant rain to generate replenishment flows otherwise these impacts will persist and possibly increase throughout summer,” said Minister Blair. “You can’t dismiss the impact of drought when in the last six months, we have had 30 gigalitres of water flow in the Northern System, while in an average year we would expect 4,000 gigalitres. The numbers speak for themselves.”

New research by the Australia Institute has only served to exacerbate the pressure on both the state and federal governments.

Maryanne Slattery, Senior Water Researcher at The Australia Institute, said that the reason for the fish kill was the mismanagement of the Menindee Lakes in southwest New South Wales.

“It is clear what has caused the Darling River fish kill – mismanagement and repeated policy failure,” said Ms Slattery. “To blame the fish kill on the drought is a cop-out, it is because water releases were made from the lakes when this simply shouldn’t have happened.

“It’s time to stop passing the buck. The Prime Minister blames the drought, the NSW Water Minister blames the Commonwealth, upstream blames downstream, and downstream blames upstream.”

In response, Minister Littleproud said the independent panel will obtain advice from NSW Department of Fisheries scientists and other experts in native freshwater fish ecology, water management and water quality.

Leading the independent panel will be the University of Melbourne’s Prof Rob Vertessy, who is also Chair of the Murray Darling Basin Authority’s independent Advisory Committee on Social, Economic and Environmental Sciences (ACEESS).

The first round of draft reports for the review is due by February 20, with final findings to be handed down the following month.



NEWS
16 Feb, 2024
HARDI Australia has long been at the forefront of technological development for Australian farmers, giving way to a game-changing solution to the perennial agricultural problem of weed control.
By Jessica Martyn 16 Feb, 2024
When it comes to building and maintaining a successful farming business in Australia, implementing the right solutions to deliver and preserve essential resources like fresh water is crucial – and in these ponds, White International is an authority more than 70 years strong.
16 Feb, 2024
After five decades of consistently setting new standards in forage harvesting technology, including perfect cut quality, ideal chop length, and efficient kernel processing, CLAAS has recently released a special edition JAGUAR 990 TERRA TRAC model at Agritechnica.
By By Jennifer McKee 16 Feb, 2024
In today's fast-paced world, embracing technology has become essential for industries to thrive, and the Australian agriculture industry is no exception.
04 Dec, 2023
As a Landcare group, one of our main interests is to increase ecological resilience in our local area. Many of our landscapes have been cleared of vegetation in previous decades, so we have the task of supporting landholders to plant trees and shrubs to replace those that are missing. The benefits of revegetation are manifold. They include providing habitat for a range of native animals; controlling erosion and salinity; increasing farm productivity through nutrient cycling and shade and shelter for stock; and drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. But as weather patterns become more variable and we experience more climatic extremes, we need to think about which plant species – and which plant genetics – are most appropriate in our revegetation efforts. We are forced to ask will our local plantings be able to survive our future climate? Up until recently, it has been common for people to preference locally sourced seed when re-planting. This has been based on the idea that such plants will be best adapted to local conditions. However, there is growing understanding among scientists and land managers that we need to shift our focus to plants that can persist as the climate changes. This involves looking at which plant species are most appropriate by focussing on species that have a wide distribution and grow in our area and also in hotter areas, and increasing the genetic diversity of our tubestock so they have the best potential to adapt over successive generations. Our Landcare group has been tackling this issue for the past several years, working with scientists and AdaptNSW to find the best way forward. There are several key steps involved: understanding our local future climate, analysing whether selected local species can survive in climates like the one projected for our area, and sourcing seed for those likely-to-survive species from a range of areas to increase the genetic diversity of our plantings. Planting the right species with good genetic diversity gives revegetation projects the best chance of survival into the future. It’s not just about making sure the individual tubestock will grow, but that future generations of those plants will be able to survive and thrive. Luckily there are some good resources available for farmers, land managers and groups interested in climate ready revegetation. The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney has launched the Restore and Renew Webtool ( https://www.restore-and-renew.org.au/ ), which is a wonderful way for people to incorporate both climate change and genetic information when sourcing seed or plants. The NSW Niche Finder is invaluable for those who want to dig further into climate variables and species distribution ( http://www.nswnichefinder.net/ ). For future climate information, the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology have joined forces to provide a user-friendly online tool ( https://myclimateview.com.au/ ). And AdaptNSW also provides projected climate change information for different regions of the state ( https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/projections-map ). The Yass Area Network of Landcare Groups also has detailed information about our work on climate ready revegetation and relevant resources our website: https://yan.org.au/projects/climate-ready-revegetation-project As the climate changes, our revegetation efforts are more important than ever. And we need to make sure that they are ‘climate ready’ so that their benefits persist well into the future.
04 Dec, 2023
Some weeks, Amy Pascoe spends more time with mushrooms than humans. In this Q&A the Little Acre co-founder talks stereotypes, innovation, and the problem with “Grown in Australia” labels.
Show More
Share by: