1MG FlippingBooks
The view from China: AAAA rating of Australian foods
Boundless Plains to Share
Chinese consumer acceptance of Australian foods has grown rapidly over the last five years. The core driver is a significant increase in consumer concern about the safety of Chinese domestic produce: higher income earners in China are concerned about their families and are increasingly looking for ways to obtain safe overseas food products from countries such as Australia.
There are four purchasing trends that have emerged as critical to Chinese consumers in the market for food products:
- Authenticity
- Affordability
- Access
- Awareness
Bulk food product integrity can be easily compromised at any stage of the production and packaging process: inappropriate handling during washing, cutting and packing, suboptimal temperature control in storage and transportation – the list goes on. In the worst cases, inferior local Chinese or foreign products are mixed with Australian produce before being labelled and marketed as ‘made in Australia’. This has created mistrust in the eyes of consumers, who have started to address this concern by seeking reliable and trusted distributors.
In China, a ‘trusted distributor’ business model known as ‘daigou’ (pronounced ‘di-go’) has developed in recent years. Essentially, Chinese nationals living overseas ‘buy on behalf of’ their Chinese relatives, friends and customers and offer a personal, reputation-based guarantee of authenticity. Daigou originally began within the European luxury goods market, where profits were made from differential import duties placed on the items. In the context of Australian produce, daigou shopping lists usually include items like infant formula, vitamins, Manuka honey, skincare products and organic baby foods.
Some brands have become very popular among Chinese consumers solely by being sold by daigou service providers!
Whilst daigou may represent a disrupting force in both markets, it also offers trustworthiness to consumers through product authenticity and proof of purchase (with infant formula, for example, Chinese consumers can be sure it is the same product that Australian mothers are using) as well as timeliness of delivery to the consumer. That is why Chinese consumers do not seem to mind paying a premium to buy Australian foods via daigou.
When it comes to affordability, products labelled ‘Australian made’ are by no means a cheap option. Higher production costs can put Australia’s high-quality products at considerable risk of losing market share to competitors, namely Brazilian and Uruguayan beef, wines from Spain, Italy and Chile, and infant formula from New Zealand.
For commercial customers, it has always been price that drives purchasing decisions. In general, products at lower price points are much preferred to higher value, premium products that cost more. For consumers, given the very short history of educated consumption of imported foods, the benefits of Australian beef (being disease and hormone free and having a better taste) can easily be undervalued in light of the better packaging and aesthetics of beef produced in other countries.
Those who are able to afford Australian foods can be classified into 3 groups:
- The ‘must have’ market, mostly comprising parents buying infant formula and red meats for their growing children. This segment has the lowest elasticity of demand; that is, buying propensity is not very highly correlated with levels of disposable income;
- The ‘nice to have’ market, comprised mostly of wealthy middle-class buyers seeking nutritional supplements and health foods not only for themselves but also for their families and elderly relatives; and
- The ‘gift givers’, who are motivated by reputational injury arising from adverse impacts of any poor quality products they provide to others. This group is also motivated by the desire to differentiate their presents from traditional gift giving standards.
To be able to afford authentic Australian foods is one thing; getting access to these foods is another. Currently, consumers in China find Australian foods through a variety of convenient channels, including:
- Department stores and supermarkets (most have areas dedicated to imported foods)
- Australian specialty stores
- Online stores
- Daigou suppliers
Public awareness of Australian brands has evolved and continues to do so. There are different levels of brand perception in China: the general ‘Australia’ brand for bulk products like beef and canola, state brands such as Tasmania’s (known for its cherries and seafood), regional brands associated with product categories like wine, and individual brands like Penfolds.
With continued education of the consumer market over time, there is no doubt that more and more successful individual brands will continue to emerge. As with all success stories of international products in China, it will be the individual brands of Australian food produce that ultimately govern loyalty and guide consumers’ purchasing decisions.
About the author: Hui Li is the co-Founder and Executive Director of VC Group, a specialist advisory firm that helps Australasian and Chinese businesses with bilateral trade and investment in food and agriculture. She has over 18 years’ experience advising foreign companies making direct investments in China and Australia, including seven years in China’s Ministry of Commerce and 3 years as Senior Manager of China Practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
NEWS

Prodoz, a Proudly Australian and family-owned agribusiness, based in Melbourne, is strengthening its positions as national/international leader in advanced crop – science solutions through a growing portfolio of global innovation partners and a distribution footprint supported by all major distributors - includes Nutrien Ag, Elders, Lindsay Rural and Independent Rural stores.

Trace minerals are required for optimal growth, reproduction, and immunity. Optimising trace mineral status relying solely on oral supplements across a herd may fail because of variation in individual intake and reduced absorption due to antagonism of other ration components and minerals. The use of injectable trace mineral supplements has been associated with positive reproductive outcomes including improved conception rate, increased odds of pregnancy and greater final in calf rate. A study conducted on 2,168 dairy cows, administered injectable trace minerals, four weeks prior to calving and again four weeks prior to the start of mating showed treated animals had a 3.3 per cent greater final in-calf rate, and a reduced time from start of mating to conception, compared to control animals 1 . The Importance of B12 Dr Carl Eden, Technical Services Veterinarian with Boehringer Ingelheim says “Vitamin B12 is sometimes referred to as a ‘super vitamin’ because it is only required in very small amounts but vital to many essential metabolic pathways. However, demand for B12 can vary considerably during the year and we see serum levels of B12 fall at critical times, such as the first few months after calving.” Vitamin B12 contains cobalt, so deficiency in cobalt can lead to deficiency in vitamin B12 because ruminants get most of their B12 as a byproduct of ruminal fermentation where the bacteria in their rumen assemble B12 from cobalt for use by the cow. Sub-optimal trace mineral and vitamin B12 status at calving, mating, and drying off has been shown to negatively impact growth, reproduction, and immunity. Using a trace mineral injectable containing vitamin B12 can improve trace mineral and vitamin B12 status at these critical times. Marks-Min with Vitamin B12 – The Evidence In the largest trace element study to date, Marks-Min Injectable Trace Mineral with Vitamin B12 demonstrated remarkable results when compared to a reference trace mineral injection. “Given the differences between Marks-Min and other products on the market, we wanted to generate a compelling data set to demonstrate how effective it was compared to the pioneer product. We entrusted this work to a third-party research company” says Dr Eden. “We chose farms that were at the top of their game from a reproductive perspective. We made sure that the farms had no evidence of trace element or vitamin B12 deficiencies or excess.” Across all outcomes of interest, Marks-Min demonstrated clear non-inferiority when compared to the reference product. Outcomes measured included submission, pregnancy and conception rates, and six week in-calf rate. Marks-Min demonstrated it is highly suited as an alternative treatment to the reference product. Reference: 1. Hawkins, D., and B. V. S. Franklin. New Zealand Dairy Veterinarians Newsletter 24 (2007): 12-16 Company website: livestockfirst.com.au Company email address: CustomerCare.Australia@boehringer-ingelheim.com Company video: https://vimeo.com/1138807630?fl=pl&fe=cm















