Blog Post

Victoria to review Roundup use following cancer claims in the US

Chanelle Mansour

Glyphosate, an active chemical in the widely used weed killer Roundup, is under review by the Victorian government after several cancer claims have been made in the United States.

Despite glyphosate having been thoroughly assessed and declared safe by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority in 2016, the Victorian government has announced it will undertake a six-week review into the handling of the chemical and its risks.

The nationwide debate began in August last year when Monsanto, the manufacturer of the herbicide Roundup (since acquired by Bayer), was taken to Californian court and ordered to pay US$289 million in compensation to former school groundskeeper DeWayne Johnson. Following the landmark US case, thousands more people came forward to sue the company.

Councils here in Australia also grew concerned after the US court’s outcome, especially given the heavy use of the chemical by families, farmers and gardeners on home soil.

Victoria’s call for the review came after two Australian law firms were reported to be investigating legal action on behalf of people suffering from cancers that are allegedly linked to exposure to Roundup. Such action could lead to millions of dollars’ worth of claims in Australia against the manufacturer of the popular weedkiller.

Despite the legal action in the US, Australian farming bodies aren’t as concerned about the effects of glyphosate and stress a science-based approach to the chemical. The National Farmers’ Federation (NFF) says that there is no other agricultural chemical that has been tested to the extent that glyphosate has, with the scientific evidence supporting glyphosate’s safety “clear and overwhelming”.

Peak industry body CropLife Australia is of the opinion that without pesticides like glyphosate, there would not be enough access to produce to feed our nation, let alone contribute to feeding the world.

“Governments must ensure that the proven and established science of chemistry prevails, so farmers continue to have access to the very best in agricultural tools and technologies,” says Matthew Cossey, CEO of CropLife Australia.

In the past three years alone, regulatory authorities in the European Union, South Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States have publicly reaffirmed that exposure to glyphosate does not cause cancer.

Last month the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reaffirmed the safety of glyphosate, finding that it is not a carcinogen. The EPA’s Glyphosate Proposed Interim Decision also found there are no risks to public health when glyphosate is used in accordance with its current label.

In January this year, Health Canada re-confirmed their position on the safety of glyphosate, along with the European Food Safety Authority, which stated that, “glyphosate is not classified or proposed to be classified as carcinogenic or toxic”.

You can read more about the scientific findings in the NFF’s campaign here.

NEWS
16 Feb, 2024
HARDI Australia has long been at the forefront of technological development for Australian farmers, giving way to a game-changing solution to the perennial agricultural problem of weed control.
By Jessica Martyn 16 Feb, 2024
When it comes to building and maintaining a successful farming business in Australia, implementing the right solutions to deliver and preserve essential resources like fresh water is crucial – and in these ponds, White International is an authority more than 70 years strong.
16 Feb, 2024
After five decades of consistently setting new standards in forage harvesting technology, including perfect cut quality, ideal chop length, and efficient kernel processing, CLAAS has recently released a special edition JAGUAR 990 TERRA TRAC model at Agritechnica.
By By Jennifer McKee 16 Feb, 2024
In today's fast-paced world, embracing technology has become essential for industries to thrive, and the Australian agriculture industry is no exception.
04 Dec, 2023
As a Landcare group, one of our main interests is to increase ecological resilience in our local area. Many of our landscapes have been cleared of vegetation in previous decades, so we have the task of supporting landholders to plant trees and shrubs to replace those that are missing. The benefits of revegetation are manifold. They include providing habitat for a range of native animals; controlling erosion and salinity; increasing farm productivity through nutrient cycling and shade and shelter for stock; and drawing down carbon from the atmosphere. But as weather patterns become more variable and we experience more climatic extremes, we need to think about which plant species – and which plant genetics – are most appropriate in our revegetation efforts. We are forced to ask will our local plantings be able to survive our future climate? Up until recently, it has been common for people to preference locally sourced seed when re-planting. This has been based on the idea that such plants will be best adapted to local conditions. However, there is growing understanding among scientists and land managers that we need to shift our focus to plants that can persist as the climate changes. This involves looking at which plant species are most appropriate by focussing on species that have a wide distribution and grow in our area and also in hotter areas, and increasing the genetic diversity of our tubestock so they have the best potential to adapt over successive generations. Our Landcare group has been tackling this issue for the past several years, working with scientists and AdaptNSW to find the best way forward. There are several key steps involved: understanding our local future climate, analysing whether selected local species can survive in climates like the one projected for our area, and sourcing seed for those likely-to-survive species from a range of areas to increase the genetic diversity of our plantings. Planting the right species with good genetic diversity gives revegetation projects the best chance of survival into the future. It’s not just about making sure the individual tubestock will grow, but that future generations of those plants will be able to survive and thrive. Luckily there are some good resources available for farmers, land managers and groups interested in climate ready revegetation. The Royal Botanic Garden Sydney has launched the Restore and Renew Webtool ( https://www.restore-and-renew.org.au/ ), which is a wonderful way for people to incorporate both climate change and genetic information when sourcing seed or plants. The NSW Niche Finder is invaluable for those who want to dig further into climate variables and species distribution ( http://www.nswnichefinder.net/ ). For future climate information, the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology have joined forces to provide a user-friendly online tool ( https://myclimateview.com.au/ ). And AdaptNSW also provides projected climate change information for different regions of the state ( https://www.climatechange.environment.nsw.gov.au/projections-map ). The Yass Area Network of Landcare Groups also has detailed information about our work on climate ready revegetation and relevant resources our website: https://yan.org.au/projects/climate-ready-revegetation-project As the climate changes, our revegetation efforts are more important than ever. And we need to make sure that they are ‘climate ready’ so that their benefits persist well into the future.
04 Dec, 2023
Some weeks, Amy Pascoe spends more time with mushrooms than humans. In this Q&A the Little Acre co-founder talks stereotypes, innovation, and the problem with “Grown in Australia” labels.
Show More
Share by: